Theories of error ar known as Khyativadas. Kyati means cognition, here erroneous cognition. Khyati means erroneous cognition. Error (of when we perceive cash in the shell) is regarded as a big issue wholly when we are to explain such a perception and are confronted with the thought that is it because of the disapprove itself or our subjective attitude towards it. any way in explaining away any khyati vada, the status of the object is put in the parameters.
The Buddhist Sunya vadins consider the object to be un documentary. Nothing is real and the illusory object is no exception. magic consists in the unreal appearing as real. When valid intimacy arises, the illusory object is sublated. This may be called Asatkhyati. Because of sublation it is not real. binding knowledge? This is difficult to imagine as Nagarjuna had written an accurate treatise, Vigrahavyavartani refusing to give any status to pramanas by method of illocution.
anyway the views of the other schools consider the object of erroneous cognition to be real in some sense. It may be that what is real within as an idea, appears as if without. This is according to the Atma-khyati (apprehension of the cognition(atma) by itself) of the Buddhist Vijnanavadin.
Or it may be that error is due to non-discrimination among two real objects one remembered and the other seen. This is the akhyati of Samkhya. Or, it may the coming into court here of a thing that is elsewhere, and is cognized through a lineament of extra ordinary perception. This is the anyatha-khyati vada of the Nyaya Vaisesika. Or error may be due to any positive wrong knowledge merely due to a mere negation of non apprehension due to received weakness of the mind of two distinct experiences combined. This is the akhyati professed by the Prabhakara...
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment