Theme Development in the Film 12 Angry Men

antecedent Development in the plastic film 12 Angry manpower\n\nIn the movie 12 Angry Men a verdict of not hangdog was given to the son afterward the fact that apparently alto admither the jurymans except one belief that the male child was guilty beyond a presumable precariousness. on the whole of the key establish presented in the court was rejected by the jury, which led the jurywomans to concur a reasonable doubt just about the boys guiltiness. I will present this rise in chronological smart set and support why on that point is a reasonable doubt that would lead each juror to change their view of the case. In my opinion few of the heel counter evidence presented was kind of weak, but the whole point of this write up is to show the trail of evidence to lead the jurors to a reasonable doubt.\n\nThe first key idea, and believably the most important, is that the boy was unretentive and couldnt afford a decent attorney. He had a court appointed attorney who pr obably had many former(a) cases to argue. This attorney had no bond certificate to the lymph node; there was no glory that the attorney could figure towards. The attorney would reall(a)y give up to believe in the client in put in to view the case properly. It was pointed out in the movie that the boy had a very poor attorney and didnt ask the even up questions. If the boy had a levelheaded attorney, he would of brought up all the points that countered the key evidence that some of the jurors pointed out.\n\nThere are a few points about the prod that would lead to reasonable doubt. unmatchable point made in the courtroom was that the person who interchange the boy the spit verbalise it was one in a kind. It would be highly marvelous that another person would exact the same lingua. However juror #8 went to the area where the boy lived and bought the same exact knife from a pawnshop. This would prove that the knife wasnt one of a kind, it was fairly common. This means th at anyone could\n\nhave bought the same knife and employ it to kill the boys father. This evidence proves that the knife that the boy purchased wasnt necessarily the clear up weapon.\n\nAn interesting question was brought up by one of the jurors. why did the boy show the off weapon to his friends just a couple of hours before the tally actually occurred? If he...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website:

Need assistance with such assignment as write my paper? Feel free to contact our highly qualified custom paper writers who are always eager to help you complete the task on time.