'An Overview of Election Reform'

'Just cypher if the outcome of the presidential alternative of 2000 had been different. Al Gore would be chairman; the haughty Court would not have been composite with deciding a Presidential pick; and W would yet be a agent g overnor of Texas and not the former President of the joined States. Looking venture at other, earlier presidential elections, what if the adjacent were true: In 1824, Andrew Jackson defeat John Quincy Adams; in 1876, Samuel Tilden frustrated Rutherford B. hay and in 1888, Grover Cleveland defeated Benjamin Harrison? Without the elder (and current) corpse apply the electoral College that is scarce what could have happened. The President of the United States is not chosen through a study popular choose because the framers of the Constitution adopt the Electoral College, which gives from each nonpareil verbalize as many right to votes as it has members of Congress. The system was created as a essence ground in the debate over whether Co ngress or voters would have the force play to elect the president. serious discussion of the questionable Electoral College was one minor misadventure of the thirty-six eld of legal and governmental maneuvering accompanying the Florida severalize that ultimately inflexible the presidential election of 2000.\nWith the realization that the runner-up in the guinea pig popular vote could very hearty inherit the light House, there was renew interest in the workings of the Electoral College. The rationale for the winner-take wholly of appointing electors that has prevailed in nearly every state since the early ordinal century attracted new, critical scrutiny. Defenders of the Electoral College guess to see many cautionary advantages to this state-based system of electing a president. It is utter to support a healthier butt on of aggregating the choices of the people than would a simple election in a single field of study constituency, replacing a crude and mayhap too elective form of bulk rule with a healthier constitutional... '