Kierkegaard And Nietzsche`s Ideas Of Existentialism

Kierkegaard , Nietzsche and ExistentialismAlthough their works and philosophical flavors predated the existentialist philosopher philosophy movement by more years , Soren Kierkegaard and Friedrich Nietzsche are often considered founding fathers of existentialism This is non to say that separately philosopher s views were identical . While they did share similarities , apiece had their declare unique mindset that was quite pronounced . For Kierkegaard , at that place is an overwhelming notion present that pack ultimately undertake themselves ground on their reaction to truth . That is , people refer a certain stamp system and then that belief system reacts to what is true . For framework , it is true that biography exists , merely an atheist and a devoutly religious person may have completely different outlo oks on where animation originates . As such , the centre of life derives from an internalization of what is outwardly cover . This may bring about the question What is true for reliable absolute truth exists and there can not be two sides to truth . From this , we move on to NietzscheNietzsche possessed a much harder edged approach to truth because he sought-after(a) to go directly to the root of what is true and hack outside at unessential material that obstructed truth . For example , in Nietzsche s criticism or art he considers the lesson lessons a dramatist may attempt to teach as inherently hoax because the world of the story establishd to put by the notion of unadulterated truths was created exclusively by the playwright (artist ) so as to create a world that perceived moral lesson . In different words , the theme is not only if true because it derives from a purely manufactured world designed to sell the truthVery fewer philosophical movements are as misco nceive as existentialism . For many , existe! ntialism s outlook that peerless must mold life on its own merits appertains purely to looking at the negative nature of life . In short , existentialism is little more than glorified cynicism .

This wrong definition is based on a number of false premises not the least of which is assuming facts not in evidence In other words , seeing life based on its own merits refers that there is emphasis on a deficiency of hope and a lack of peremptory beliefs . Again , this is awry(p) because if an existentialist believes that people are inherently good and that duty is the central tenant of human beings then seeing life on its own merits may refer to a belief that all human action is inherently good . This is further from a misanthropic outlook granted , many existentialist philosophers did not have such a bright look outlook on the world and the people who inhabited it , precisely this was not because they were cynical , but because they were realists who looked at life homogeneous it actually was and in looking at life as it was they understood that humans created who they were in call of creating their identity , their outlook on the word and , to a undischarged extent , their own self worth and meaning . This meaning could be cynical , it could be gullible or it...If you wish to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper